Category Archives: Advocacy

Toilets for health

This report, published to mark World Toilet Day 2012, provides an overview of the sanitation crisis and the related burden of disease in developing countries. While it shows that interventions in the water, sanitation and hygiene sector are the most effective ways to address morbidity and mortality, the report concludes that the importance of these interventions in developing countries is not acknowledged.

Roma, E. and Pugh, I., 2012. Toilets for health : a report by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in collaboration with Domestos. [online] London, UK: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. 28 p.; 12 fig.; 1 tab.; photographs; boxes
Available at: <www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/multimedia/features/toilets_for_health.pdf>

Menstrual hygiene matters

Menstrual hygiene is fundamental to the dignity and wellbeing of women and girls and an important part of the basic hygiene, sanitation and reproductive health services. However, menstruation is too often taboo, and has many negative cultural attitudes associated with it, including the idea that menstruating women and girls are ‘contaminated’, ‘dirty’ and ‘impure’.

This resource kit provides modules and toolkits on improving menstrual hygiene for women and girls in lower and middle-income countries. It covers key aspects of menstrual hygiene in different settings, including communities, schools and emergencies.

The resource kit brings together examples of good menstrual hygiene practice from around the world.

The nine modules and accompanying toolkits, cover the following topics:

  • menstrual hygiene – the basics
  • menstrual hygiene – getting started
  • menstrual hygiene – sanitary protection materials and disposal
  • working with communities on menstrual hygiene
  • working with schools on menstrual hygiene
  • working in emergencies on menstrual hygiene
  • supporting girls and women in vulnerable, marginalised or special circumstances
  • menstrual hygiene in the workplace
  • research, monitoring and advocacy

House, S., Mahon, T. and Cavill, S., 2012. Menstrual hygiene matters : a resource for improving menstrual hygiene around the world. [online] London, UK: WaterAid. 347 p.; ill.; tab.; fig.; boxes
Available at: <http://washurl.net/5iyh2e>

Guidelines for planning and providing multiple-use water services

This manual synthesises various existing guidelines on the multiple-use water services (MUS) approach into one concise set of generic guidelines on ‘how to do MUS’.

The MUS approach considers the multiple needs of (poor) water users, who take water from a number of sources, and communities’ own priorities as the starting point for investments in new infrastructure, management arrangements, the rehabilitation of existing infrastructure, or for improvements in management and governance. MUS approaches have been successfully piloted in over 20 low- and middle-income countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

The set of guidelines provide guidance on planning, developing and providing MUS based on the experiences of members of the MUS Group, which was established in 2006. The guidelines are targeted towards people and organisations already interested in applying or adapting the MUS approach in their specific context.

The guidelines are divided into four parts:

Part 1 provides the conceptual background, by introducing the main terms and concepts referred to in the guidelines.

Part 2 presents guidelines for planning and provision of multiple-use water services;  introduces common elements; and describes the six identified common steps in detail, including suggestions for support tools.

Part 3 consists of guidelines for the creation of an enabling environment for MUS at intermediate and national levels, which focus on evidence-based advocacy for MUS and capacity development;  suggestions for support tools are also included.

Part 4 provides a reference guide to the support tools mentioned in parts 2 and 3.

Annexes provide an overview of organisations with a special interest and experience in MUS, and overviews of the different elements and summaries of the various MUS guidelines presented.

Adank, M., Koppen, B. van and Smits, S., 2012. Guidelines for planning and providing multiple-use water services. [online] The Hague, The Netherlands: IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre and Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 123 p.; 16 tab.; 7 fig.; 3 boxes. ISBN 9789066870796
Available at: <http://www.musgroup.net/page/1447> [Accessed 18 May 2012].

HuffPost Water

The Huffington Post news blog launched a new section dedicated to clean water issues on November 1st, 2011. The new section is a joint initiative of HuffPost founder Arianna Huffington and Water.org co-founders Gary White and Matt Damon, who wanted a platform to present and discuss solutions for the lack of sanitation and safe water around the world.

Web site: www.huffingtonpost.com/news/clean-water

Rights to water and sanitation: a handbook for activists

Book coverEl-Jazairi, L. (2010). Rights to water and sanitation: a handbook for activists. London, UK, Freshwater Action Network (FAN). vi, 86 p. : 1 fig., 5 tab., photogr.

With a foreword by Catarina de Albuquerque, United Nations Independent Expert on the issue of human rights obligations related to access to safe drinking water and sanitation.

Download handbook [PDF file, 1 MB]

The purpose of this handbook is to help civil society and those working on water and sanitation issues to adopt a human rights-based approach to advocacy, so that they can improve water and sanitation service regulation and provision at international, national and local levels. Directed primarily at community groups, human rights NGOs, rights-based development practitioners and aid workers, this handbook aims to strengthen human rights-based advocacy by providing innovative and practical suggestions that activists and organisations can use in their work. It also acts as a resource guide for finding further information.

The handbook begins with a brief introduction to the legal basis and content of the human right to water and sanitation and the obligations that governments and other actors hold. Chapter 2 introduces the reader to the steps necessary in planning an advocacy campaign. Chapter 3 describes a number of different advocacy ‘tactics’ or ‘activities’ that could be used on an advocacy campaign, including: lobbying; using media and communications; public campaign/popular mobilisation; capacity building; legal advocacy/litigation; and building networks and coalitions. For each tactic or activity a case study is provided. An appendix includes a list of international commitments, an example of a press statement and a lobbying letter, a list of resources.

Related web site: The Rights to Water and Sanitation

Water and Climate Change Coalition

The Water and Climate Change Coalition (WCC) was launched at a side event at the climate change talks in Bonn, Germany, on 3rd June, 2010.

The WCC advocates for inclusion of water resources management in policy responses to climate change, especially in the outcomes of the negotiations under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

The WCC evolved from the Global Public Policy Network on Water Management (GPNN), an initiative of Stakeholder Forum and Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI). The GPNN was originally set up to coordinate civil society participation in the review of water and sanitation commitments at the 16th session of the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD-16). In 2009, the GPNN decided to focus its efforts almost exclusively on water and climate issues.

WCC members include: Cap-Net, Chartered Institute for Water and Environmental Management (CIWEM), International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Freshwater Action Network (FAN), Green Cross International, Global Water Partnership (GWP), Progressio, University of North Carolina (UNC) Water Institute, and World Wildlife Fund (WWF).

Stakeholder Forum and Stockholm International Water Institute jointly host the WCC Secretariat.

The WCC web site provides background information and news about it advocacy activities.

Web site: www.waterclimatecoalition.org

Making the case for sanitation and hygiene: opening doors in health

In 2009 the Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council (WSSCC) worked with the international NGO Tearfund and UK-based Overseas Development Institute (ODI) to examine how sector professionals advocate for sanitation and hygiene to health professionals – and how to improve that advocacy.

A number of leading sanitation and hygiene specialists provided input as well as professionals from the health sector and WSSCC National Coordinators. The outcomes are summarized in an ODI Background Note [1], which examines how health practitioners perceive sanitation and hygiene issues, how sanitation and hygiene professions can strengthen the case for improved services, and what the capacity and research needs are vis-à-vis training health staff in preventive sanitation- and hygiene-based interventions.

[1] Newborne, P. (2010). Making the case for sanitation and hygiene: opening doors in health. (Background note / ODI). London, UK, Overseas Development Institute (ODI). 6 p. : 4 boxes, 1 tab. 9 ref.
Download full document [PDF file]

WASHwatch.org: a new advocacy resource for civil society

A new online advocacy tool for the WASH sector is being developed. The website www.WASHwatch.org aims to make it easy for civil society to monitor their governments’ political declarations on WASH, such as eThekwini in Africa and SACOSAN in South Asia. Civil society organisations (CSOs) can also upload government budget data to compare how countries are prioritising the sector.

WASHwatch.org is currently under development and only accessible to registered users. Pages for Nepal and Nigeria have the most complete information so far. A public version will be available in the near future.

WASHwatch.org aims to make advocacy easier in the following ways:

  • Easy comparison of different countries’ progress against political commitments like eThekwini and SACOSAN.
  • Easy tracking of government budgets for WASH, and quick comparison to neighbouring countries
  • Easy printing of the data to take to a meeting

Source: Serena O’Sullivan, End Water Poverty blog, 27 May 2010

Global Framework for Action

The Global Framework for Action (GFA) is an alliance of national governments, donors, civil society organizations and other development partners working together to increase political will and improve aid-effectiveness by mobilizing and better targeting resources for water supply and sanitation.

The UK and Dutch Governments launched the GFA in September 2008. Both governments are members of the the GFA Interim Core Group, which also includes AMCOW, ANEW, End Water Poverty, UNICEF, UN-Water, WaterAid, WSSCC, WHO, and World Bank/WSP. UNICEF is coordinating the GFA secretariat.

The GFA web site, maintained by End Water Poverty, includes background information, documents, contacts and updates.

Web site: sites.google.com/site/globalframeworkforaction/

Charity: water No. 1 in Water Twitter Top Ten

charity-water-Twitter

With over 300,000 “followers” on Twitter, New York-based charity: water reaches by far the largest audience in the water sector, a search in Twitter’s yellow pages, Twellow, reveals.

Twitter is a free micro-blogging service that lets users send and receive short messages via the web or mobile devices. Water charities, especially in the United States, have embraced the “SMS of the Internet” to communicate with their supporters.

Charity: water’s huge following on Twitter is not surprising. Twitter co-founder Biz Stone (650,000 followers) promoted charity: water in his September 2008 Twitter newsletter.

By hosting “Twestivals” simultaneously in 202 cities around the world in February 2009, charity: water’s supporters helped raise over US$ 250,000 for water projects. And two months later when actor Hugh Jackman pledged to donate A$100,000 via Twitter, charity: water took home half of the prize thanks to a lobby by its followers.

In the “Water Twitter Top Ten”, UNICEF USA’s Tap Project campaign takes up second place behind charity: water with a “meager” 7,000 followers. The only non-charities in the top ten are the advocacy group Food and Water Watch and a company promoting rainwater harvesting. At no. 10, we find WaterAid UK, the only non-USA-based organisation. See the full top 10 below.

Further down in the Twitter water rankings, US-based charities and NGOs remain the dominant force, especially those whose sole or main function is fundraising. Organisations from the government, private and academic sectors, seem slow or reluctant to jump on the Twitter bandwagon.

Sanitation is poorly represented too: World Famous Toilets has 910 followers on Twitter, while the World Toilet Organization (WTO) has attracted a mere 31.And so far, there are no “tweets on water” being sent from developing countries.

View the Water Twitter Top Ten here and a longer WASH on Twitter list, by organisation-type, here.